My name is Patrik Hutzel from intensivecarehotline.com, where we instantly improve the lives of families of critically ill patients in intensive care so that you can make informed decisions and have peace of mind, control, power, and influence, making sure your loved one always gets the best care and treatment, even if you’re not a doctor or a nurse in intensive care.

Today I’m answering a question from Robert, and I will read out his question. Before I do, you may ask what makes me qualified to answer questions for families in intensive care. I have worked in critical care nursing for over 25 years in three different countries, where I worked as a nurse manager for over five years in intensive care. I’ve been consulting and advocating for families in intensive care all over the world here at intensivecarehotline.com since 2013, and I can very confidently say that we have saved many lives for our clients in intensive care. You can verify that in our testimonial section at intensivecarehotline.com and in our podcast section at intensivecarehotline.com, where we have done client interviews.

Robert writes:

“Hi Patrik, my mom is currently in ICU on a mechanical ventilator following a stroke. She’s now on day 9 of her recovery and is showing signs of waking up, which is encouraging. However, the ICU team is not wanting to wait any longer and is recommending that she proceed with a tracheostomy. I asked the doctors whether they could wait a few more days, perhaps three additional days, given that she appears to be making progress. I want to understand whether that was a reasonable request on my part.

“My questions are: Given that my mom is showing signs of waking up at day 9 post-stroke, is it clinically appropriate to push back on the timeline for tracheostomy? What are the risks of waiting a few more days versus proceeding now? Is there a window of neurological recovery that the ICU team should be factoring into this decision? And what should I be asking the medical team to ensure my mom has every possible chance of coming off the ventilator without needing a permanent tracheostomy?

“I want to make sure we are not rushing into a procedure that may not be necessary if she continues to improve, and I would appreciate your expert guidance on how to advocate for her effectively.

From Robert.”

If you have a loved one in ICU right now, like, subscribe, share the video with your friends and families, and click the notification bell so that you don’t miss any of my videos. Comment below what you want to see and what videos you want me to create.

Let’s now look at what a tracheostomy is and why the ICU team is recommending it at day 9.

A tracheostomy is a surgical procedure where a small incision is made in the front of the neck, and a breathing tube called a tracheostomy tube is inserted directly into the trachea, or windpipe. Instead of breathing through a tube that passes through the mouth or nose into the airway, called an endotracheal tube or ETT, the patient breathes through this shorter, more stable tube in the neck.

The ICU team typically recommends a tracheostomy when they believe a patient is going to need mechanical ventilation for a prolonged period, usually beyond 10 to 14 days. The reasons they give families often include greater patient comfort compared to having a tube in the mouth or throat, reduced risk of vocal cord damage from a long-term endotracheal tube, easier airway management and nursing care, the ability to begin weaning the patient off the ventilator more gradually, and sometimes, though not always, an expectation that the patient may not be able to breathe independently.

Here’s the key issue that families often do not understand. A tracheostomy is not a reversible decision in the short term. Once it is done, it changes the entire trajectory of your mom’s care, her rehabilitation pathway, and in some cases her long-term prognosis. It is a significant procedural step, and it deserves serious scrutiny, especially when the patient is showing signs of neurological improvement, as your mom is.

So let’s look at day 9 after stroke. Where is your mom at neurologically? This is the most important context for Robert’s question, and it is the part that I want families to understand deeply.

Stroke recovery, particularly when it has led to a level of neurological compromise significant enough to require mechanical ventilation, does not follow a simple linear timeline. The brain after a stroke is undergoing a complex and ongoing process. Swelling is resolving. Areas of penumbra, tissue that was injured but not destroyed, are either recovering or dying. And the neurological system is beginning to reorganize and compensate. Day 9 is still very early. Critically, day 9 is within a neurological recovery window that many ICU teams do not adequately communicate to families. This window is particularly relevant for patients who were initially deeply unconscious or poorly responsive after their stroke and who are now beginning to show signs of waking up.

Signs of waking up, which Robert mentioned his mom is showing, are clinically significant. These signs can include opening eyes spontaneously or to voice, following simple commands such as squeezing a hand, purposeful movements in response to pain or touch, attempting to resist or interact with the ventilator, and changes in facial expression in response to stimulation. These are not incidental findings. They are neurological signals that the brain is regaining function. When a patient is showing these signs at day 9, the question of whether to proceed with a tracheostomy or to give the brain more time is a genuinely complex clinical decision, not a foregone conclusion.

Is it reasonable to ask the ICU team to wait a few more days? Absolutely, Robert, yes, it is absolutely reasonable. I want you to know that you were not being obstructive or difficult when you asked that question. You were doing exactly what a good advocate for your mom should do.

Here’s what the evidence and clinical experience tell us. Most guidelines around the timing of tracheostomy, including those from critical care societies, suggest that while early tracheostomy in the first four to seven days can reduce sedation requirements and ICU length of stay in some patient populations, there is no strong evidence that it improves survival or neurological outcomes compared to a slightly later approach in the 10 to 14 day window.

For stroke patients specifically, the calculus is even more nuanced. The neurological trajectory in the first one to two weeks can change dramatically. A patient who appears to need prolonged ventilation at day 7 may be showing strong improvement signals at day 10 or 11. Conversely, a patient who is showing improvement at day 9 may plateau, but that plateau is impossible to predict without giving the brain more time to declare itself.

Asking for three additional days when your mom is already showing signs of waking up is not an unreasonable request. It is in fact a clinically defensible request, and you deserve an honest answer from the ICU team as to why they feel that waiting poses unacceptable risks, if that is their position.

Here’s the key advocacy point, Robert. The ICU team should be able to explain clearly and specifically why they cannot wait three more days. If their answer is vague, such as “it is just better to do it now” or “we always do it around this time,” that is not a sufficient clinical justification for a procedure of this significance. Push back respectfully and ask for specifics.

Let’s now look at the risks of waiting three more days versus proceeding now. Let me give you a clear and balanced picture of both sides.

Potential risks of waiting: Continued presence of the endotracheal tube increases the theoretical risk of subglottic aspiration and ventilator-associated pneumonia, though good oral care and positioning significantly mitigate this. Some clinicians argue that a prolonged ETT increases the risk of tracheal damage, though this is less of a concern in the first 10 to 14 days with modern tube designs and cuff management. If your mom is fighting the ventilator or requires high levels of sedation to tolerate the tube, continued waiting may not serve her interests.

Potential benefits of waiting: If neurological improvement continues, she may reach a level of consciousness and airway protective function where she can be extubated, have the tube removed, without needing a tracheostomy at all. This avoids a surgical procedure with its associated risks, including bleeding, infection, and anesthetic complications. It preserves the possibility of a more straightforward rehabilitation pathway without the physical and psychological burden of a tracheostomy, and it gives the brain more time to demonstrate its recovery trajectory before committing to a longer-term airway management strategy.

The clinical truth here is this: if your mom continues to improve over the next three days and begins to meet extubation criteria, and extubation is the removal of the breathing tube, you will have avoided a tracheostomy entirely. If her improvement plateaus or she deteriorates, the tracheostomy can still be performed. Waiting three days is not an irreversible decision. A tracheostomy can be an irreversible decision.

Picture this. Wait three more days. Your mom is ready for extubation and can be extubated. The breathing tube is removed, and she can breathe by herself spontaneously. She can go to a hospital ward. Versus letting her have a tracheostomy, where she may stay in ICU for weeks or months on end. She may never get off the tracheostomy. It’s hard to predict that. Or she may need services like Intensive Care at Home, which I’ll come to later. But the best option is always, if someone can be extubated, to remove the breathing tube and avoid the tracheostomy. That is the best option.

Next, the neurological recovery window, and what the ICU team must factor in. I want to make sure Robert and every family watching this understands what I mean by the neurological recovery window, because it is a concept that is critically important and often inadequately explained in ICU.

After a stroke that is severe enough to result in loss of consciousness and the need for mechanical ventilation, the brain goes through several phases in the first few weeks. The acute phase, roughly days 1 to 5, is dominated by swelling, metabolic disruption, and the immediate effects of the infarct or hemorrhage. In this phase, prognosticating neurological outcome is genuinely difficult and often inaccurate.

From roughly day 5 to day 14, and sometimes beyond, the brain enters a phase where secondary recovery begins. Penumbral tissue that survived the initial event but was metabolically compromised can recover function. Cerebral edema resolves. The reticular activating system, the network responsible for arousal and consciousness, may begin to resume activity even in patients who appear deeply comatose in the first few days.

This is why showing signs of waking up at day 9 is clinically meaningful. It suggests that the brain is doing something positive, and any decision about tracheostomy, a procedure that commits the patient to a long-term trajectory, should take this neurological trajectory explicitly into account.

The ICU team should be asking and answering: What is the current level of consciousness on validated scales, such as the Glasgow Coma Scale or the FOUR score? Is the trend improving, stable, or deteriorating? Has a formal neurological consultation been obtained, and what is the neurologist’s assessment of the recovery trajectory? What does CT or MRI imaging show about the extent and location of the stroke, and how does that correlate with the observed clinical picture? Is the patient beginning to demonstrate any airway protective reflexes, such as coughing or a gag reflex, that might support extubation in the coming days?

Next, what should you be asking the medical team? Robert, I want to give you a concrete list of questions that you should be asking the ICU team, and that you should be asking them to answer in writing or at a formal family meeting, not just in a corridor conversation.

Number 1: What is my mom’s current Glasgow Coma Scale, also known as GCS, or FOUR score, and how has it changed over the past three to four days?

Number 2: What specific clinical criteria would she need to meet for you to consider extubation?

Number 3: Has a neurologist assessed her recently, and what is their prognosis for recovery of consciousness and airway protective reflexes?

Number 4: What is the specific clinical risk of waiting three to five more days before deciding on tracheostomy, given that she is showing signs of improvement?

Number 5: What is the plan if we wait and she continues to improve? What is the plan if she plateaus?

Number 6: What are the risks of the tracheostomy procedure itself in her current condition?

Number 7: If she receives a tracheostomy, what does the weaning and rehabilitation plan look like?

Number 8: Is there a palliative care consultation available if we need to have broader goals of care conversations?

Important: do not accept vague answers to these questions. You are entitled to clear, specific clinical information. If you’re not getting that, you need an advocate in that room with you right now.

Next, why access to all medical records is non-negotiable. This is something I say to every family I work with, and I’m going to say it again here clearly. You must request and obtain copies of all of your mom’s medical records right now. I am not talking about a discharge summary that arrives weeks later. I am talking about daily ICU progress notes from every doctor and nurse, all specialist consultation reports including neurology, CT and MRI imaging reports, ventilation weaning records, what parameters she is currently on and how they have changed, nursing assessment charts including consciousness level scores and respiratory observations, and any formal family meeting notes or goals of care documentation.

Why does this matter so much? Because the medical records tell it all. They tell the real story of what is happening to your mom, not the summary version that gets filtered through a brief corridor update or a brief bedside update.

When my team and I review medical records with families on a consulting call, we consistently find information that changes the conversation: deteriorations or improvements that were not clearly communicated, specialist opinions that the treating team did not fully incorporate, and clinical data that directly bears on decisions like tracheostomy timing.

You have a legal right to these records under laws in the US, in Australia, in Canada, in the UK, anywhere really. Request them in writing or verbally, keep copies, and bring them to any family meeting. If you want someone experienced to review them with you, that is exactly what we do at intensivecarehotline.com.

Let’s now look at treatment options for Robert’s mom right now. Let me walk you through the realistic clinical pathways that Robert’s mom faces so that the family can understand what each one means and advocate accordingly.

Option 1: Continue with the endotracheal tube and monitor for three to five more days. That is the option Robert is advocating for, and it is clinically defensible if his mom is showing improvement in her neurological signs. During this period, the ICU team should be minimizing sedation and minimizing opiates to allow her maximum opportunity to demonstrate her level of consciousness. They should be conducting daily spontaneous breathing trials, which are periods where ventilator support is reduced to test whether she can breathe more independently, assessing airway protective reflexes regularly, and obtaining a formal neurology review if not already done.

Option 2: Proceed with tracheostomy right now. If the ICU team can provide a clear clinical justification, for example, that she’s requiring very high sedation and opiates to tolerate the breathing tube, that her airway protective reflexes remain absent, or that her neurological imaging suggests recovery of consciousness is unlikely in the short term, then tracheostomy may be the appropriate next step. But Robert deserves to understand the basis for that recommendation in full.

If a tracheostomy is performed, the goals of care should include a structured ventilator weaning program with clear milestones, regular assessment for decannulation (removal of the tracheostomy tube) when she’s ready, speech therapy involvement to assess swallowing and communication options, and early rehabilitation including physiotherapy and occupational therapy.

Option 3: Goals of care discussion and palliative pathway. I raise this not because I believe it is the right option for Robert’s mom based on what he has described. She’s showing signs of improvement, and this is day 9, which is early, very early as a matter of fact. But families in this situation deserve to know that this conversation exists and that they have the right to be part of it. If the ICU team at any point is recommending withdrawal of active treatment or a purely palliative care approach, you have every right to seek a second opinion and to have that recommendation explained in full with the clinical evidence that supports it.

Let’s now look at what happens if your mom needs a tracheostomy and can’t be weaned off the ventilator. Let’s look at Intensive Care at Home.

I want Robert and his family to know that a tracheostomy and long-term ventilation do not automatically mean a permanent ICU stay. That is what I want to tell you about Intensive Care at Home, and you can find more information at intensivecareathome.com.

Intensive Care at Home is a third-party accredited specialist home intensive care nursing provider for ventilator-dependent adults and children, with or without tracheostomies. Intensive Care at Home is ISO 9001:2015 certified and NDIS registered. Currently we are mainly operating all around Australia, in all major capital cities and in all regional and rural areas, in all states and territories, but we also help families in the US, in Canada, and in the UK.

The bottom line is that with Intensive Care at Home, we specialize in exactly this kind of complex home care, keeping long-term ventilated adults and children out of ICU. If Robert’s mom ultimately requires long-term ventilation, whether invasive through a tracheostomy or non-invasive through a mask such as BiPAP, CPAP, APAP, or VPAP, and if she’s medically stable enough to be cared for outside the ICU, Intensive Care at Home can provide 24-hour specialist intensive care nursing in the family home, full ventilation management, tracheostomy care and respiratory support, ongoing clinical assessments, medication management, and liaison with the treating medical team, with support for children and adults.

Funding options include NDIS funding, TAC, DVA, iCare, or private funding, such as private health funds and departments of health. Private health insurance, of course. Palliative care ventilation at home is also available for families who wish to have their loved ones at home in their final stages.

For many families, home is where their loved one most wants to be. For ventilator-dependent patients, the difference between a life in ICU or a rehabilitation ward and a life at home, surrounded by family in a familiar environment with specialist nursing support, can be profound. Go to our sister site, www.intensivecareathome.com, to learn more or to speak with our team about whether Intensive Care at Home is an option for your loved one.

Next, how a consulting call with myself can help Robert right now. Robert, I want you to understand that you do not have to navigate this alone. The decisions being made about your mom right now, tracheostomy timing, ventilator weaning, neurological prognosis, and goals of care, are among the most significant decisions that will be made in her entire ICU stay.

When you work with me and my team at intensivecarehotline.com, here is what we do. We review your mom’s medical records with you in detail. We explain what the clinical data actually means in plain language. We give you the specific questions to ask and the specific advocacy language to use. We speak directly with the ICU team on your behalf, questioning, advocating, and ensuring that your mom’s interests are being fully represented. We help you understand all of your options, including second opinions, transfer, and long-term care pathways.

We have helped thousands of families in exactly this kind of situation. Families who felt powerless and overwhelmed have walked out of ICU family meetings with clarity, confidence, and a plan. This is exactly what we do. Like I said, we have saved so many lives for our clients in intensive care who were meant to die, and with our help and advocacy we have turned many situations around. Once again, you can verify that in our testimonial section at intensivecarehotline.com and on our intensivecarehotline.com podcast, where we have done client interviews.

Let’s quickly summarize what Robert and every family in this situation needs to know.

Day 9 post-stroke with signs of neurological improvement is not the time to rush into an irreversible procedure without strong clinical justification.

Asking the ICU team to wait three more days is a reasonable, clinically defensible request, and you deserve a specific, evidence-based answer if they disagree.

The neurological recovery window in the first one to two weeks after stroke is real and must be factored into this decision.

You must obtain all medical records immediately. They contain the clinical story that the team may not be telling you in full.

If your mother  cannot be weaned from the ventilator, home ventilation care through Intensive Care at Home is a real, proven, evidence-based alternative to permanent ICU and institutional care.

You do not have to advocate alone. intensivecarehotline.com is here to help you.

A final note to Robert: you are asking exactly the right questions. Your instinct to push back and give your mom more time is not obstructive. It is love. Keep advocating. She needs you in that room asking these questions, and we are here to help you every step of the way.

I have worked in critical care nursing for 25 years in three different countries where I worked as a nurse manager for over five years in intensive care. And I’ve been consulting and advocating for families in intensive care since 2013 here at intensivecarehotline.com. And I can very confidently say that we have saved many lives with our consulting and advocacy, because of our insights, and you can verify that on our testimonial section  at intensivecarehotline.com and you can verify it on our intensivecarehotline.com podcast section, where we have done client interviews.  And because our advice is absolutely life-changing, right?

The biggest challenge for families in intensive care is simply that they don’t know what they don’t know. They don’t know what to look for, they don’t know what questions to ask, they don’t know their rights, and they don’t know how to manage doctors and nurses in intensive care. And that’s why we help you to improve your life instantly, making sure you make informed decisions, have peace of mind, control, power, and influence, making sure your loved one gets the best care and treatment always. And that’s why you can join a growing number of members and clients that we have helped over the years, saving their loved ones’ lives.

And that’s why I do one on one consulting and advocacy over the phone, Zoom, WhatsApp, whichever medium works best for you. And I talk to you and your families directly. I handhold you through this once-in-a-lifetime situation that you simply cannot afford to get wrong. And when I talk to families directly, I also talk to doctors and nurses directly, asking all the questions that you haven’t even considered asking but must be asked when you have a loved one critically ill in intensive care.  I also represent you in family meetings with intensive care teams.

We also do medical record reviews in real time so that you can get a second opinion in real time. We also do medical record reviews after intensive care, so, if, in case you have unanswered questions, if you need closure or if you are suspecting medical negligence.

We also have a membership for families of critically ill patients in intensive care, and you can become a member if you go to intensivecarehotline.com. If you click on the membership link or if you go to intensivecaresupport.org directly. In the membership, you have access to me and my team 24 hours a day in the membership area and via email, and we answer all questions intensive care-related. In the membership, you also have exclusive access to 21 e-books and 21 videos that I’ve personally written and recorded. And all of that will help you to improve your life instantly, make informed decisions, have peace of mind, control, power, and influence, making sure your loved one gets the best care and treatment always.

And all of that you get at intensivecarehotline.com. Call us on one of the numbers at the top of our website or simply send us an email to support at intensivecarehotline.com with your questions.

If you like my videos, subscribe to my YouTube channel for regular updates for families in intensive care. Click the like button, click the notification bell, share the video with your friends and families, and comment below what you want to see next, what questions and insights you have from this video.

I also do a weekly YouTube live.

where I answer your questions live on a show and you will get notification from the YouTube Live if you are a subscriber to my YouTube channel or if you are a subscriber to my intensivecarehotline.com email newsletter at intensivecarehotline.com.

Thank you so much for watching.

This is Patrik Hutzel from intensivecarehotline.com, and I will talk to you in a few days.

Take care for now.